Thursday, 30 September 2010

Unconventional ways of saving for an education

E-mailFrom Thursday's Globe and MailPublished Thursday, Sep. 02, 2010 5:00AM EDTLast updated Friday, Sep. 03, 2010 11:44AM EDT1 commentEmailTweetPrintDecrease text sizeIncrease text size

Now that my kids have decided they want to be brain surgeons, I’ve been thinking about how to pay for their post-secondary education. Two methods of saving for a child’s education are often overlooked. The first is a family trust, and the second is life insurance.

Paying for college: Beg, borrow, steal, sweat and saveStudent financial aid flubsBack to school

10 ways to beat the taxman honestly

You don't have to lie to save tax. We look at the legitimate ways you can reduce your bill. 

By Emma Simon
Published: 5:52PM BST 24 Sep 2010

Comments

Have losers in your portfolio? Think before you sell

E-mailFrom Wednesday's Globe and MailPublished Thursday, Sep. 16, 2010 7:05AM EDTLast updated Thursday, Sep. 23, 2010 6:50AM EDT1 commentEmailTweetPrintDecrease text sizeIncrease text size

There are certain losses in life which, if not handled properly, can lead to heartache. But handle them well and your losses can be beneficial in the long run.

Five ways to cut your year-end tax tallyThe right way to approach tax-loss sellingThe 1-2-3s of ratios for investors

My cousin, Paul, has handled one such loss quite well. You see, he’s lost most of his hair. He went to the barber the other day and found out that it was going to cost him $26 for a haircut. “Joe, how can you possibly charge me $26 when I barely have any hair?” Paul said to the barber. “How about I pay you $12 to find my hair, then I’ll cut it myself.” The fact that he has lost his hair doesn’t bother Paul one bit. He laughs about it all the time.

How do you handle your losses? Let’s forget about your hair for a minute. Let’s talk about your portfolio.

THE STRATEGY

As year-end approaches, many investors will be scouring their portfolios looking for investments that have dropped in value to sell them before year-end so that the capital losses can offset capital gains that might otherwise give rise to taxes.

Many will sell investments that have dropped in value without thinking twice about what they’re doing. Before you pull the trigger, consider the following questions:

1. Are you unhappy with the investment? If you don’t like that loser in your portfolio any more, perhaps because its fundamentals have changed, or you see a better opportunity elsewhere, then it may be worth selling for that reason alone, regardless of taxes. But what if you still like the prospects of the investment? Then ask the next question:

2. Do you have capital gains this year or in the prior three years against which to offset your capital losses? If so, by all means go ahead and sell that loser to trigger some losses to offset those gains. This will save you tax. To the extent capital losses aren’t used in the current year, they can be carried back up to three years to offset capital gains in the past, which can result in a refund of taxes paid in the past.

But what if you answer “no” to these questions? In this case, give serious thought to holding the investment. By selling, you might just incur transactions costs for no reason. If your investment does rebound as you hope and expect, holding the investment will have been the least costly and most efficient approach.

THE CONSIDERATIONS

I know what many of you will be thinking: “Even if I still like the investment and have no capital gains to offset, why not sell anyway and reinvest in the same investment or something very similar?” The rationale is that it’s always good to have capital losses available to offset future capital gains (capital losses can be carried forward indefinitely).

Be careful. If you sell a loser and reinvest in the same or an identical security, you could face the superficial loss rules. These rules simply say that when you sell a security at a loss and you acquire and continue to hold the same or identical securities in the period that is 30 days prior to or after your sale, your capital loss will be denied.

If you insist on triggering a capital loss, you might consider investing is something similar, but not the same or an identical security. The Canada Revenue Agency explains the concept of an “identical property” in Interpretation Bulletin IT-387R2 (available at www.cra.gc.ca) by saying that these are “properties which are the same in all material respects, so that a prospective buyer would not have a preference for one as opposed to another.”

CRA goes on to explain that it’s “necessary to compare the inherent qualities or elements which give each property its identity.” This would include looking at specific rights attached to a security.

If, for example, you sell shares of ABC Corp. for a loss on the open market and then acquire and continue to hold the same class of shares within 30 days, your loss will be denied.

But what if you sell one index fund or exchange-traded fund and acquire a different one that is designed to mirror the same index? It’s less clear in this case that you’ve acquired an “identical property,” although you can make an argument they are not identical properties if the underlying basket of securities or their weightings are at all different from each other. This may allow you to switch to a very similar index fund or ETF without worrying about your loss being denied.

Investing with ETFs: Ask Howard Atkinson

Save on taxes: Sell losing sharesSelling your dogs can help to curb your tax billThe ABCs of dividend ETFsWeighing in on the ‘September Effect’Santa brings a rally for those who play it rightHow to avoid withholding tax on U.S. dividend stocks Why fund managers are embracing ETFs1 commentEmailTweetPrintDecrease text sizeIncrease text sizeToday's Must ReadsSports Blue Jays hail retiring GastonNews ‘Mr. Vancouver’ seeks help to finish his magnum opusGlobe Drive Strategies for last IndyCar race of the seasonLife Hogtown’s burger wars could use a Five Guys pattyLife How do I get my sister to leave her unhappy marriage?More from The Globe and Mail

Wednesday, 29 September 2010

David Cameron will cut middle class tax

David Cameron holds out the prospect of tax cuts for the middle classes as he makes clear his intention to “give something back” from a stronger economy. 

By Andrew Porter and Benedict Brogan
Published: 9:55PM BST 24 Sep 2010

Five ways to cut your year-end tax tally

E-mailFrom Thursday's Globe and MailPublished Thursday, Sep. 23, 2010 6:50AM EDTLast updated Wednesday, Sep. 29, 2010 5:47PM EDT11 commentsEmailTweetPrintDecrease text sizeIncrease text size

Okay, I’m turning over a new leaf. I have promised my wife that I won’t wait until Dec. 24 to start my Christmas shopping. Procrastination is now a thing of the past. And just to prove it, I’m starting a discussion of year-end tax planning ideas early. Here we are in September, and last week I wrote about harvesting capital losses before year-end. This week, I want to share a few more ideas because there is still time to make a push in 2010 to reduce your taxes for this year. So let’s hop to it.

More related to this storyTFSAs: When you dieTurn 'dead’ money into new wealthHave losers in your portfolio? Think before you sell